Class Statistics
What are Spinel Oxide Catalysts?
Spinel oxide catalysts represent a versatile class of mixed-metal oxides defined by the general formula AB2O4, where A and B represent cations occupying distinct tetrahedral and octahedral sites within a cubic close-packed oxygen lattice. This structural arrangement allows for significant chemical flexibility, as various transition metals can be substituted into the lattice to tune electronic properties. The primary significance of these materials lies in their mixed-valence cation sites, which facilitate efficient oxygen redox chemistry, making them essential components in electrochemical energy conversion systems. By enabling rapid electron transfer and oxygen adsorption-desorption processes, spinel oxides serve as high-performance, cost-effective alternatives to precious metal catalysts in air electrodes for metal-air batteries and oxygen evolution reactions in water electrolysis. Notable members of this family include cobalt-based spinels like Co3O4, which is widely studied for its intrinsic catalytic activity, and nickel-cobalt spinels such as NiCo2O4, which are frequently employed for their enhanced electrical conductivity and synergistic catalytic effects. Because they can be synthesized through various scalable methods, including hydrothermal, sol-gel, and combustion techniques, spinel oxides are central to the development of sustainable energy technologies. Their ability to maintain structural stability while providing abundant active sites for electrochemical reactions ensures their continued relevance in the transition toward renewable energy storage and hydrogen production infrastructures.
Top Spinel Oxide Catalysts
Ranked by data richness — literature synthesis coverage, multi-source DFT corroboration, and patent activity.
| Formula | Band Gap | Best EAH (eV/atom) | Stability | DFT Sources | Recipes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CaFe2O4 | 0.98–2.26 eV | 0.0119 | Metastable | 1 | 21 |
| LaMnO3 | 0.03–1.69 eV | 0.0000 | Stable | 1 | 141 |
| CaMnO3 | 0.21–2.00 eV | 0.0000 | Stable | 1 | 27 |
| Al2NiO4 | 0.86–3.60 eV | 0.0000 | Metastable | 1 | 24 |
| La2NiO4 | 0.53–2.19 eV | 0.0435 | Metastable | 1 | 62 |
| Ca2Fe2O5 | 0.32–1.05 eV | 0.0000 | Stable | 1 | 19 |
| LaNiO3 | 0.36–0.54 eV | 0.0000 | Stable | 1 | 69 |
| MgAl2O4 | 5.40–5.63 eV | 0.0000 | Stable | 1 | 87 |
| Al2CoO4 | 0.74–3.22 eV | 0.0000 | Metastable | 1 | 21 |
| Al2MgO4 | 2.71–5.11 eV | 0.0000 | On hull (stable) | — | 87 |
| BiFeO3 | 0.15–1.81 eV | 0.0016 | Near hull (likely stable) | — | 322 |
| AlCuO2 | 0.83–2.33 eV | 0.0000 | Stable | 1 | 28 |
| FeBiO3 | 1.13–1.52 eV | 0.0092 | Metastable | 1 | 322 |
| LaAlO3 | 3.33–4.28 eV | 0.0000 | Stable | 1 | 61 |
| SrMnO3 | 0.31–1.79 eV | 0.0000 | Stable | 1 | 24 |
| LaFeO3 | 0.29–2.23 eV | 0.0000 | Stable | 1 | 131 |
| CrCuO2 | 1.04–1.88 eV | 0.0000 | Stable | 1 | 26 |
| Fe2NiO4 | 1.23–1.38 eV | 0.0000 | Metastable | 1 | 137 |
| LaCoO3 | 0.28–1.70 eV | 0.0000 | Stable | 1 | 126 |
| Fe2O4Zn | 0.67–1.69 eV | 0.0000 | On hull (stable) | — | 95 |
| YAlO3 | 2.95–5.88 eV | 0.0000 | Stable | 1 | 39 |
| YMnO3 | 0.38 eV | 0.0000 | Stable | 1 | 44 |
| SrFeO3 | 0.71–0.76 eV | 0.0000 | Stable | 1 | 45 |
| LaCrO3 | 0.15–2.57 eV | 0.0000 | Stable | 1 | 32 |
| YFeO3 | 0.58–2.27 eV | 0.0000 | Stable | 1 | 20 |
| TiZnO3 | 1.57–3.12 eV | 0.0109 | Stable | 1 | 45 |
| FeCuO2 | 0.50–1.06 eV | 0.0000 | Stable | 1 | 23 |
| Al2O4Zn | 3.03–3.85 eV | 0.0000 | On hull (stable) | — | 35 |
| Fe2MgO4 | 0.15–1.99 eV | 0.0000 | On hull (stable) | — | 56 |
| CaAl2O4 | 4.27–5.31 eV | 0.0000 | Stable | 1 | 25 |
| SrAl2O4 | 3.49–4.82 eV | 0.0000 | Stable | 1 | 86 |
| Al2CaO4 | 4.19–4.98 eV | 0.0007 | On hull (stable) | — | 25 |
| CrLaO3 | 2.12–2.37 eV | 0.0000 | On hull (stable) | — | 32 |
| PrMnO3 | 0.33 eV | 0.0000 | Stable | 1 | 20 |
| BaAl2O4 | 2.62–4.76 eV | 0.0000 | Stable | 1 | 27 |
| Al2O4Sr | 3.92–4.14 eV | 0.0000 | On hull (stable) | — | 86 |
| Mg(FeO2)2 | 0.60–1.42 eV | 0.0000 | On hull (stable) | — | 56 |
| MnO3Sr | 0.95 eV | 0.0000 | On hull (stable) | — | 24 |
| Fe2CoO4 | 0.69 eV | 0.0000 | Metastable | 1 | 148 |
| Fe2CuO4 | 0.24 eV | 0.0000 | Stable | 1 | 63 |
| GeO4Zn2 | 1.98 eV | 0.0000 | On hull (stable) | — | 30 |
| Mn2ZnO4 | 0.06–0.92 eV | 0.0000 | Stable | 1 | 19 |
| AlLaO3 | 3.50–4.48 eV | 0.0000 | On hull (stable) | — | 61 |
| Al2ZnO4 | 3.70–4.25 eV | 0.0000 | Stable | 1 | 35 |
| Zn(FeO2)2 | 0.63–1.32 eV | 0.0000 | On hull (stable) | — | 95 |
| FeLaO3 | 0.88–1.95 eV | 0.0000 | On hull (stable) | — | 131 |
| Nb2ZnO6 | 3.24–3.44 eV | 0.0000 | Stable | 1 | 34 |
| BaFe12O19 | 0.83–1.22 eV | 0.0031 | Near hull (likely stable) | — | 132 |
| Ca(FeO2)2 | 1.33–1.43 eV | 0.0000 | On hull (stable) | — | 21 |
| FeO3Y | 0.64–1.59 eV | 0.0087 | Near hull (likely stable) | — | 20 |
Frequently Asked Questions
How many spinel oxide catalysts are in the database?
10,943 spinel oxide catalysts are tracked, of which 0 have multi-source DFT validation and 1,439 have documented synthesis routes.
What is the most data-rich spinel oxide catalyst?
Which spinel oxide catalyst has the widest band gap?
What makes the spinel structure effective for catalysis?
Why are spinel oxides considered cost-effective compared to other catalysts?
How does substituting different metals into the spinel lattice affect performance?
In which practical applications are spinel oxide catalysts most commonly used?
Related Research
What makes a transparent conducting oxide work, why indium tin oxide dominates, and how FTO, AZO, silver nanowires, and graphene compare as ITO alternatives.
A catalog of interpretation errors and compute failure modes from our materials discovery pipeline: thermostat overshoot (625K target / 750K actual), MACE artifacts on perovskites, PBE bandgaps presented without HSE correction, metallic DFPT results, phonon instabilities, 53 files with THz vs cm⁻¹ confusion, and more.
Every single Modal QE DFPT and HSE06 result from our April 2026 GPU compute campaign was an error payload, not usable data. 13 files landed on the volume with status ERROR, PSEUDO_ERROR, SCF_FAILED, DFPT_FAILED, PARSE_ERROR, or NOT_CONVERGED. The honest-null pattern in our ledger is what saved rankings from corruption.
Related Material Classes
Screen spinel oxide catalysts computationally
Evaluate stability, supply-chain risk, and patent whitespace before committing lab resources.
Explore the Platform →