Class Statistics
What are Conversion Oxide Anodes?
Conversion oxide anodes represent a distinct class of electrode materials for lithium-ion batteries that operate through a fundamental chemical transformation rather than the traditional intercalation mechanism. Unlike graphite, which hosts lithium ions within its layered structure, binary transition-metal oxides—such as cobalt oxide, iron oxide, and tin oxide—undergo a complete conversion reaction. During the lithiation process, these oxides react with lithium to form metallic nanoparticles dispersed within a lithium-oxide matrix. This mechanism allows for the storage of multiple lithium ions per metal atom, resulting in theoretical capacities that significantly exceed those of conventional carbon-based anodes. Because of this high energy density, these materials are considered essential candidates for next-generation, high-performance energy storage systems. However, the practical application of conversion oxide anodes faces persistent challenges. The conversion process is inherently associated with substantial volume expansion and contraction during cycling, which can lead to mechanical pulverization of the electrode material and loss of electrical contact. Furthermore, these materials typically exhibit significant voltage hysteresis, where the discharge potential is notably lower than the charge potential, leading to reduced energy efficiency. Despite these hurdles, ongoing research into nanostructuring, carbon-coating, and binder optimization aims to mitigate these issues, making conversion oxides a focal point for researchers seeking to push the boundaries of battery capacity. By engineering the morphology and interface of these oxides, scientists hope to stabilize the conversion reaction, thereby unlocking the potential for longer-lasting and more powerful battery technologies.
Top Conversion Oxide Anodes
Ranked by data richness — literature synthesis coverage, multi-source DFT corroboration, and patent activity.
| Formula | Band Gap | Best EAH (eV/atom) | Stability | DFT Sources | Recipes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fe3O4 | 0.24–1.41 eV | 0.0000 | Metastable | 1 | 28 |
| CoO2 | 0.01–1.25 eV | 0.0000 | Stable | 1 | 27 |
| Fe6O8 | 0.15 eV | — | Not assessed | — | 28 |
| Co1O2 | 1.32 eV | — | Not assessed | — | 27 |
| Fe12O16 | 0.15–0.78 eV | — | Not assessed | — | 28 |
| Co4O8 | Metallic / not reported | — | Not assessed | — | 27 |
| Co2O4 | Metallic / not reported | — | Not assessed | — | 27 |
| Co3O6 | Metallic / not reported | — | Not assessed | — | 27 |
| Co0.9O1.8 | Metallic / not reported | — | Not assessed | — | 27 |
| Fe24O32 | Metallic / not reported | — | Not assessed | — | 28 |
| MnO2 | 0.15–1.93 eV | 0.0000 | Stable | 1 | 8 |
| SnO2 | 0.07–2.38 eV | 0.0000 | Stable | 1 | 9 |
| O2Sn | 0.32–2.00 eV | 0.0000 | On hull (stable) | — | 9 |
| Mn3O4 | 0.35–0.83 eV | 0.0000 | Stable | 1 | 7 |
| Fe2O3 | 0.12–1.69 eV | 0.0000 | Stable | 1 | 5 |
| Co3O4 | 1.35–1.80 eV | 0.0000 | Stable | 1 | 5 |
| MnO | 0.18–1.16 eV | 0.0000 | Unstable | 1 | 4 |
| CuO | 0.02 eV | 0.0000 | Stable | 1 | 2 |
| O4Sn2 | 0.03–0.38 eV | — | Not assessed | — | 9 |
| O8Sn4 | 0.13–0.37 eV | — | Not assessed | — | 9 |
| CoO | 0.22–1.82 eV | 0.0000 | Unstable | 1 | 2 |
| Mn4O8 | 0.87–1.04 eV | — | Not assessed | — | 8 |
| O16Sn8 | 0.25 eV | — | Not assessed | — | 9 |
| O24Sn12 | 0.32 eV | — | Not assessed | — | 9 |
| Mn3O6 | 0.48 eV | — | Not assessed | — | 8 |
| FeO3 | 0.31 eV | 0.2071 | Above hull | — | 3 |
| Mn6O8 | 0.67 eV | — | Not assessed | — | 7 |
| FeO2 | 0.38–1.15 eV | 0.0000 | Stable | 1 | 1 |
| MoO3 | 0.09–2.44 eV | 0.0000 | Stable | 1 | 0 |
| Mn12O16 | 0.38 eV | — | Not assessed | — | 7 |
| O2Sn1 | Metallic / not reported | — | Not assessed | — | 9 |
| MoO2 | 0.46–1.40 eV | 0.0000 | Stable | 1 | 0 |
| Fe4O6 | 0.26–1.31 eV | — | Not assessed | — | 5 |
| Mn2O4 | Metallic / not reported | — | Not assessed | — | 8 |
| FeO | 0.05–2.30 eV | 0.0000 | Metastable | 1 | 0 |
| Mn2O3 | 0.07–0.48 eV | 0.0000 | Stable | 1 | 0 |
| O6Sn3 | Metallic / not reported | — | Not assessed | — | 9 |
| Co6O8 | 0.33 eV | — | Not assessed | — | 5 |
| SnO | 0.21–1.92 eV | 0.0000 | Stable | 1 | 0 |
| Mn1O2 | Metallic / not reported | — | Not assessed | — | 8 |
| Mn0.5O | Metallic / not reported | — | Not assessed | — | 8 |
| Co2O3 | 0.15–1.33 eV | 0.0992 | Metastable | — | 0 |
| Cu2O | 0.46–1.39 eV | 0.0000 | Stable | 1 | 0 |
| Mo2O5 | 0.51–1.51 eV | 0.0084 | Stable | 1 | 0 |
| Fe16O24 | 1.40 eV | — | Not assessed | — | 5 |
| MnO3 | Metallic / not reported | 0.2730 | Unstable | 1 | 1 |
| MoO4 | 0.50–0.91 eV | 0.4694 | Above hull | — | 0 |
| Mn1O1 | 0.18 eV | — | Not assessed | — | 4 |
| Cu2O3 | 0.14–0.22 eV | 0.0000 | On hull (stable) | — | 0 |
| Fe7O8 | 1.07 eV | 0.0629 | Unstable | 1 | 0 |
Frequently Asked Questions
How many conversion oxide anodes are in the database?
435 conversion oxide anodes are tracked, of which 0 have multi-source DFT validation and 75 have documented synthesis routes.
What is the most data-rich conversion oxide anode?
Which conversion oxide anode has the widest band gap?
How do conversion oxide anodes differ from traditional intercalation anodes?
Why do conversion oxide anodes suffer from voltage hysteresis?
What is the primary cause of capacity fade in these materials?
How can the performance of conversion oxide anodes be improved?
Related Research
A band gap sets whether a solid is a metal, semiconductor or insulator. Learn direct vs indirect gaps, how gaps are measured, and why DFT underestimates them.
What makes a transparent conducting oxide work, why indium tin oxide dominates, and how FTO, AZO, silver nanowires, and graphene compare as ITO alternatives.
How the Materials Project, OQMD, AFLOW and JARVIS-DFT differ in size, DFT functional, license and access, why their values disagree, and when to use each.
Related Material Classes
Screen conversion oxide anodes computationally
Evaluate stability, supply-chain risk, and patent whitespace before committing lab resources.
Explore the Platform →