Class Statistics
What are Spinel and Hexagonal Ferrites?
Spinel and hexagonal ferrites represent a critical class of ceramic magnetic materials characterized by their unique combination of high electrical resistivity and significant magnetic permeability. Chemically, these materials are complex iron oxides, typically featuring a crystal structure derived from the mineral spinel or magnetoplumbite. In spinel ferrites, the structure consists of a cubic close-packed arrangement of oxygen ions with metal cations occupying specific interstitial sites. Common formulations include manganese-zinc and nickel-zinc compositions, which are engineered to minimize eddy current losses, making them indispensable for high-frequency applications. Hexagonal ferrites, such as barium hexaferrite, possess a more complex, layered crystal structure that imparts high magnetocrystalline anisotropy, rendering them ideal for permanent magnet applications. These materials are arguably the most produced magnetic substances globally by volume, serving as the backbone for modern electronics and power management. Their importance stems from their ability to guide magnetic flux efficiently while acting as electrical insulators, a property that traditional metallic magnets lack. By suppressing energy dissipation through eddy currents, ferrites enable the miniaturization and increased efficiency of inductors, transformers, and radio-frequency components. Beyond their role in power electronics, they are essential in microwave devices, data storage technologies, and electromagnetic interference shielding, where their tunable magnetic properties allow for precise control over signal propagation and noise suppression. As technology shifts toward higher frequencies and more compact power architectures, the strategic development of these ferrites remains a cornerstone of materials science, driving innovation in everything from consumer wireless chargers to industrial power conversion systems.
Top Spinel and Hexagonal Ferrites
Ranked by data richness — literature synthesis coverage, multi-source DFT corroboration, and patent activity.
| Formula | Band Gap | Best EAH (eV/atom) | Stability | DFT Sources | Recipes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MgFe2O4 | Metallic / not reported | — | Not assessed | 1 | 23 |
| ZnFe2O4 | Metallic / not reported | — | Not assessed | 1 | 38 |
| BaFeO3 | Metallic / not reported | 0.0000 | On hull (stable) | 4 | 7 |
| Sr2FeMoO6 | 0.19–0.73 eV | 0.0000 | On hull (stable) | 2 | 3 |
| SrFeO3 | Metallic / not reported | 0.0000 | On hull (stable) | 2 | 5 |
| MnFe2O4 | Metallic / not reported | — | Not assessed | 1 | 8 |
| MgFeO2 | 0.15–1.99 eV | 0.0000 | On hull (stable) | 2 | 0 |
| ZnFeO2 | 0.23–1.67 eV | 0.0000 | On hull (stable) | 2 | 0 |
| SrFeO2 | 1.94 eV | 0.0000 | On hull (stable) | 2 | 1 |
| MgFeO3 | 0.11–0.23 eV | 0.1134 | Above hull | 2 | 0 |
| Fe2Mg2O6 | 0.11–0.23 eV | 0.1134 | Above hull | 2 | 0 |
| Li2FeCo3O8 | 0.19–0.71 eV | 0.0010 | Near hull (likely stable) | 2 | 0 |
| Sr2Fe2O5 | 0.38–0.81 eV | 0.0005 | On hull (stable) | 2 | 0 |
| Li2Fe3CuO8 | 0.06 eV | 0.0426 | Metastable | 2 | 0 |
| Ba2Fe2O5 | 0.88–1.42 eV | 0.0000 | On hull (stable) | 1 | 0 |
| Li2Mn3FeO8 | 0.01–0.89 eV | 0.0073 | Near hull (likely stable) | 2 | 0 |
| FeCuO2 | 0.80 eV | 0.0000 | On hull (stable) | 2 | 0 |
| Sr2FeWO6 | 0.58–2.40 eV | 0.0000 | On hull (stable) | 2 | 0 |
| Li2FeCoO4 | 0.53–0.84 eV | 0.0745 | Metastable | 2 | 0 |
| Li2FeNi3O8 | 0.08–0.27 eV | 0.0212 | Near hull (likely stable) | 2 | 0 |
| Li2MnFeO4 | 0.20–1.21 eV | 0.0156 | Near hull (likely stable) | 2 | 0 |
| Ba2FeO4 | 2.00 eV | 0.0000 | On hull (stable) | 1 | 0 |
| FeCo3O8 | 0.19–0.25 eV | 0.0821 | Metastable | 2 | 0 |
| Li4Fe3CoO8 | 0.25–1.80 eV | 0.0117 | Near hull (likely stable) | 2 | 0 |
| LiFeCoO4 | 0.04–0.72 eV | 0.0444 | Metastable | 2 | 0 |
| Mg4FeO5 | 0.02–3.46 eV | 0.0093 | Near hull (likely stable) | 2 | 0 |
| Li3Fe2CoO6 | 0.46–2.10 eV | 0.0111 | Near hull (likely stable) | 2 | 0 |
| Co2Fe4O8 | 0.14–1.55 eV | 0.0102 | Near hull (likely stable) | 2 | 0 |
| Fe2CoO4 | 0.14–1.55 eV | 0.0102 | Near hull (likely stable) | 2 | 0 |
| Mg3FeO4 | 2.93–3.28 eV | 0.0105 | Near hull (likely stable) | 2 | 0 |
| Li3MnFe3O8 | 0.34–1.64 eV | 0.0229 | Near hull (likely stable) | 2 | 0 |
| Ba2NbFeO6 | 1.35–1.69 eV | 0.0000 | On hull (stable) | 2 | 0 |
| Li4MnFe3O8 | 0.63–1.10 eV | 0.0126 | Near hull (likely stable) | 2 | 0 |
| Mg2FeO4 | 0.01 eV | 0.1278 | Above hull | 2 | 0 |
| MnFeO2 | 0.57–1.32 eV | 0.0000 | On hull (stable) | 2 | 0 |
| BaYFe2O5 | 0.47 eV | 0.0456 | Metastable | 2 | 0 |
| Li3Fe3NiO8 | 0.93 eV | 0.0185 | Near hull (likely stable) | 2 | 0 |
| Li3FeCo3O8 | 0.16 eV | 0.0530 | Metastable | 2 | 0 |
| Li4Fe3NiO8 | 1.14 eV | 0.0083 | Near hull (likely stable) | 2 | 0 |
| Ba2FeMoO6 | 0.77–0.90 eV | 0.0000 | On hull (stable) | 1 | 1 |
| BaYFe4O7 | 1.58 eV | 0.0531 | Metastable | 2 | 0 |
| Fe2NiO4 | 1.28–1.36 eV | 0.0000 | On hull (stable) | 2 | 0 |
| La2MgFeO6 | 0.54 eV | 0.0016 | Near hull (likely stable) | 2 | 0 |
| Li4FeCo3O8 | 0.08–0.96 eV | 0.1205 | Above hull | 2 | 0 |
| LiMnFeO4 | 0.65–1.45 eV | 0.0073 | Near hull (likely stable) | 2 | 0 |
| MgFeSiO4 | 3.32–4.02 eV | 0.0000 | On hull (stable) | 2 | 0 |
| Sr3Fe2O5 | 0.64 eV | 0.0200 | Near hull (likely stable) | 2 | 0 |
| Mn2FeO3 | 0.11 eV | 0.0739 | Metastable | 2 | 0 |
| BaNdFe2O5 | 0.91 eV | 0.0076 | Near hull (likely stable) | 2 | 0 |
| Fe3Li5Mn2O10 | 0.19–1.11 eV | 0.0268 | Metastable | 2 | 0 |
Frequently Asked Questions
How many spinel and hexagonal ferrites are in the database?
1,704 spinel and hexagonal ferrites are tracked, of which 136 have multi-source DFT validation and 10 have documented synthesis routes.
What is the most data-rich spinel and hexagonal ferrite?
Which spinel and hexagonal ferrite has the widest band gap?
Why are ferrites preferred over metallic magnets in high-frequency applications?
What is the primary difference between spinel and hexagonal ferrites?
How does the crystal structure influence the magnetic properties of these materials?
Are spinel ferrites considered environmentally hazardous?
Related Material Classes
Screen spinel and hexagonal ferrites computationally
Evaluate stability, supply-chain risk, and patent whitespace before committing lab resources.
Explore the Platform →