Mn(FeO2)2
Mn(FeO2)2 has a DFT band gap of 0.24–0.83 eV across 13 reported structures in 4 space groups; its reference structure is cubic (Fd-3m (No. 227)). Cross-validated across 2 computational databases.
At a glance
Key Properties
Cross-validated computational properties for Mn(FeO2)2, aggregated across 2 databases.
Band GapEnergy needed to move an electron from the valence band to the conduction band. Lower or zero values tend to behave more metallic; larger gaps are more insulating or semiconducting.
0.24–0.83 eV
Range across DFT structures · ground state: narrow gap
Energy Above HullThermodynamic distance from the most stable set of competing phases. 0 eV/atom is on the convex hull; small positive values may still be experimentally accessible.
0.000 eV/atom
Best (lowest) across sources
StabilityA plain-language summary of the best reported energy-above-hull result. It reflects whether the lowest-energy structure is on, near, or far from the stability hull.
Stable
2 DFT sources
StructuresCount of reported calculated crystal structures for this formula, including alternate polymorphs, source databases, and observed space groups.
13
2 databases, 4 space groups
Validation
Cross-Source DFT Agreement
How well independent DFT databases agree on the thermodynamics of Mn(FeO2)2. Tight agreement means computed properties can be trusted without re-running calculations.
Agreement ScoreA normalized confidence score summarizing how closely independent DFT databases agree. Higher scores mean tighter cross-source agreement.
1.00 / 1.00
Trust tier: medium
Hull SpreadDifference between the highest and lowest energy-above-hull values reported by comparable sources. Smaller spread means less thermodynamic disagreement.
0.000 eV
EAH spread across sources
Sources ComparedNumber and names of computational sources with comparable entries for this formula.
2
materials_project, oqmd
Space Group ConsensusWhether independent sources predict the same crystal symmetry for the lowest-energy structure.
—
Crystallography
Reported Structures
Lowest-energy structures reported for Mn(FeO2)2, ranked by energy above hull.
| Space GroupSymmetry classification of the crystal arrangement. The number is the international space-group index. | Crystal SystemBroad lattice family, such as cubic, tetragonal, monoclinic, or triclinic, derived from unit-cell symmetry. | Band Gap (eV)Electronic gap calculated for this specific reported structure, measured in electronvolts. | E above hull (eV/atom)Thermodynamic distance from the convex hull for this structure, normalized per atom. Lower is generally more stable. | E/atom (eV)Computed total energy normalized per atom. Use energy above hull, not this value alone, when comparing stability. | Density (g/cm³)Mass per relaxed crystal volume, reported in grams per cubic centimeter. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fd-3m (No. 227) | cubic | 1.21 | 0.0000 | -8.392 | 5.49 |
| — | — | 0.83 | 0.0000 | -1.813 | — |
| — | — | 0.83 | 0.0002 | -1.813 | — |
| — | — | 0.24 | 0.0617 | -1.752 | — |
| P1 (No. 1) | triclinic | 0.00 | 0.0848 | -8.308 | 4.74 |
| — | — | 0.00 | 0.0985 | -1.715 | — |
| Imma (No. 74) | orthorhombic | 0.00 | 0.1062 | -8.286 | 4.78 |
| Cmcm (No. 63) | orthorhombic | 0.57 | 0.1388 | -8.254 | 5.19 |
| P-1 (No. 2) | triclinic | 1.32 | 0.1562 | -8.236 | 4.81 |
| C2/m (No. 12) | monoclinic | 1.19 | 0.1806 | -8.212 | 4.87 |
| Fd-3m (No. 227) | cubic | — | — | — | 4.96 |
| R-3 (No. 148) | trigonal | — | — | — | 5.65 |
Synthesis
Synthesis Routes
Literature-extracted synthesis procedures targeting Mn(FeO2)2.
Sol Gel
Procedure available · ceder_sol_gel
Sol Gel
Procedure available · ceder_sol_gel
Sol Gel
Procedure available · ceder_sol_gel
Sol Gel
Procedure available · ceder_sol_gel
Sol Gel
Procedure available · ceder_sol_gel
Sol Gel
Procedure available · ceder_sol_gel
Reference
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about Mn(FeO2)2, answered from cross-validated data.
What is the band gap of Mn(FeO2)2?
Mn(FeO2)2 has a DFT-computed band gap of 0.24–0.83 eV across 13 reported structures. Standard DFT underestimates band gaps, so the measured gap is typically larger.
More questions
Is Mn(FeO2)2 a metal, semiconductor, or insulator?
DFT predicts a band gap of up to 0.83 eV (a semiconductor). Measured gaps are typically larger.
Is Mn(FeO2)2 thermodynamically stable?
Yes — Mn(FeO2)2 sits on the convex hull (energy above hull 0 eV/atom), i.e. stable.
What is the crystal structure of Mn(FeO2)2?
The reference structure of Mn(FeO2)2 is cubic symmetry, space group Fd-3m (No. 227).
What is the density of Mn(FeO2)2?
The computed density of the ground-state structure of Mn(FeO2)2 is 5.49 g/cm³.
How many polymorphs of Mn(FeO2)2 are known?
13 structures of Mn(FeO2)2 are reported across 2 databases, spanning 4 distinct space groups.
How is Mn(FeO2)2 synthesized?
Literature-reported routes for Mn(FeO2)2 include sol gel, solid state (10 procedures documented).
What elements does Mn(FeO2)2 contain?
Mn(FeO2)2 contains Fe, Mn, and O (3 elements).
Where does the data for Mn(FeO2)2 come from?
Mn(FeO2)2 data is cross-referenced from materials_project, oqmd, cod, mpaloe.
Explore
Related Compounds
Other Oxide Oxygen-Evolution Catalysts in the database.
Data sources & attribution
- materials_project — Data from the Materials Project (materialsproject.org). Cite: Jain et al., APL Materials 1, 011002 (2013). (CC-BY-4.0)
- oqmd — Data from the OQMD (oqmd.org). Cite: Saal et al., JOM 65, 1501 (2013); Kirklin et al., npj Comp. Mater. 1, 15010 (2015). (CC-BY-4.0)
- cod — Data from the Crystallography Open Database (crystallography.net/cod/). Cite: Grazulis et al., J. Appl. Cryst. 42, 726 (2009). (CC0-1.0)
- mpaloe — Data from MP-ALOE. Cite: Kuner et al., npj Comput. Mater. (2025), doi:10.1038/s41524-025-01834-9.
Analyze Mn(FeO2)2 in the Lattice Graph platform
Polymorph comparison, confidence scoring, supply-chain risk, and patent monitoring — across 85 source databases.
Explore the Platform →