La2.25Li2Nb1.25O13Ti2.75
La2.25Li2Nb1.25O13Ti2.75 has a DFT band gap of Metallic / not reported across 2 reported structures in 2 space groups; its reference structure is tetragonal (P42/mnm (No. 136)). Cross-validated across 1 computational databases.
Key Properties
Cross-validated computational properties for La2.25Li2Nb1.25O13Ti2.75, aggregated across 1 database.
Band GapEnergy needed to move an electron from the valence band to the conduction band. Lower or zero values tend to behave more metallic; larger gaps are more insulating or semiconducting.
Energy Above HullThermodynamic distance from the most stable set of competing phases. 0 eV/atom is on the convex hull; small positive values may still be experimentally accessible.
StabilityA plain-language summary of the best reported energy-above-hull result. It reflects whether the lowest-energy structure is on, near, or far from the stability hull.
StructuresCount of reported calculated crystal structures for this formula, including alternate polymorphs, source databases, and observed space groups.
Cross-Source DFT Agreement
How well independent DFT databases agree on the thermodynamics of La2.25Li2Nb1.25O13Ti2.75. Tight agreement means computed properties can be trusted without re-running calculations.
No independent DFT source reports a hull energy for La2.25Li2Nb1.25O13Ti2.75 yet, so cross-source agreement can't be assessed.
Reported Structures
Lowest-energy structures reported for La2.25Li2Nb1.25O13Ti2.75, ranked by energy above hull.
| Space GroupSymmetry classification of the crystal arrangement. The number is the international space-group index. | Crystal SystemBroad lattice family, such as cubic, tetragonal, monoclinic, or triclinic, derived from unit-cell symmetry. | Band Gap (eV)Electronic gap calculated for this specific reported structure, measured in electronvolts. | E above hull (eV/atom)Thermodynamic distance from the convex hull for this structure, normalized per atom. Lower is generally more stable. | E/atom (eV)Computed total energy normalized per atom. Use energy above hull, not this value alone, when comparing stability. | Density (g/cm³)Mass per relaxed crystal volume, reported in grams per cubic centimeter. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P42/mnm (No. 136) | tetragonal | — | — | — | 5.10 |
| I4/mmm (No. 139) | tetragonal | — | — | — | — |
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about La2.25Li2Nb1.25O13Ti2.75, answered from cross-validated data.
What is the band gap of La2.25Li2Nb1.25O13Ti2.75?
The reported DFT structures of La2.25Li2Nb1.25O13Ti2.75 show no band gap. Standard DFT often misses gaps (especially in transition-metal oxides), so this is not proof the real material is a metal.
Is La2.25Li2Nb1.25O13Ti2.75 a metal, semiconductor, or insulator?
What is the crystal structure of La2.25Li2Nb1.25O13Ti2.75?
What is the density of La2.25Li2Nb1.25O13Ti2.75?
How many polymorphs of La2.25Li2Nb1.25O13Ti2.75 are known?
What elements does La2.25Li2Nb1.25O13Ti2.75 contain?
Where does the data for La2.25Li2Nb1.25O13Ti2.75 come from?
Related Compounds
Other Perovskite Lithium Conductors in the database.
Data sources & attribution
- cod — Data from the Crystallography Open Database (crystallography.net/cod/). Cite: Grazulis et al., J. Appl. Cryst. 42, 726 (2009). (CC0-1.0)
Analyze La2.25Li2Nb1.25O13Ti2.75 in the Lattice Graph platform
Polymorph comparison, confidence scoring, supply-chain risk, and patent monitoring — across 85 source databases.
Explore the Platform →