I2O
I2O has a DFT band gap of 0.35 eV across 98 reported structures in 21 space groups. Cross-validated across 3 computational databases.
IO
At a glance
Key Properties
Cross-validated computational properties for I2O, aggregated across 3 databases.
Band GapEnergy needed to move an electron from the valence band to the conduction band. Lower or zero values tend to behave more metallic; larger gaps are more insulating or semiconducting.
0.35 eV
Range across DFT structures · ground state: metal
Energy Above HullThermodynamic distance from the most stable set of competing phases. 0 eV/atom is on the convex hull; small positive values may still be experimentally accessible.
0.065 eV/atom
Best (lowest) across sources
StabilityA plain-language summary of the best reported energy-above-hull result. It reflects whether the lowest-energy structure is on, near, or far from the stability hull.
Metastable
2 DFT sources
StructuresCount of reported calculated crystal structures for this formula, including alternate polymorphs, source databases, and observed space groups.
98
3 databases, 21 space groups
Validation
Cross-Source DFT Agreement
How well independent DFT databases agree on the thermodynamics of I2O. Tight agreement means computed properties can be trusted without re-running calculations.
Agreement ScoreA normalized confidence score summarizing how closely independent DFT databases agree. Higher scores mean tighter cross-source agreement.
0.49 / 1.00
Trust tier: low
Hull SpreadDifference between the highest and lowest energy-above-hull values reported by comparable sources. Smaller spread means less thermodynamic disagreement.
0.127 eV
EAH spread across sources
Sources ComparedNumber and names of computational sources with comparable entries for this formula.
2
jarvis, oqmd
Space Group ConsensusWhether independent sources predict the same crystal symmetry for the lowest-energy structure.
—
Crystallography
Reported Structures
Lowest-energy structures reported for I2O, ranked by energy above hull.
| Space GroupSymmetry classification of the crystal arrangement. The number is the international space-group index. | Crystal SystemBroad lattice family, such as cubic, tetragonal, monoclinic, or triclinic, derived from unit-cell symmetry. | Band Gap (eV)Electronic gap calculated for this specific reported structure, measured in electronvolts. | E above hull (eV/atom)Thermodynamic distance from the convex hull for this structure, normalized per atom. Lower is generally more stable. | E/atom (eV)Computed total energy normalized per atom. Use energy above hull, not this value alone, when comparing stability. | Density (g/cm³)Mass per relaxed crystal volume, reported in grams per cubic centimeter. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | 0.00 | 0.0648 | -0.215 | — |
| P1 (No. 1) | triclinic | 0.35 | 0.1923 | 0.038 | — |
| Pmm2 (No. 25) | orthorhombic | 0.00 | 0.2767 | 0.123 | — |
| — | — | 0.00 | 0.4505 | 0.171 | — |
| — | — | 0.00 | 1.5016 | 1.222 | — |
| P1 (No. 1) | triclinic | — | — | — | 4.05 |
| P1 (No. 1) | triclinic | — | — | — | 5.96 |
| P1 (No. 1) | triclinic | — | — | — | 4.25 |
| P1 (No. 1) | triclinic | — | — | — | 4.68 |
| P1 (No. 1) | triclinic | — | — | — | 5.28 |
| P1 (No. 1) | triclinic | — | — | — | 4.74 |
| P1 (No. 1) | triclinic | — | — | — | 5.88 |
Reference
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about I2O, answered from cross-validated data.
What is the band gap of I2O?
I2O has a DFT-computed band gap of 0.35 eV across 98 reported structures. Standard DFT underestimates band gaps, so the measured gap is typically larger.
More questions
Is I2O a metal, semiconductor, or insulator?
DFT predicts a band gap of up to 0.35 eV (a semiconductor). Measured gaps are typically larger.
Is I2O thermodynamically stable?
I2O has a lowest energy above hull of 0.065 eV/atom (metastable).
How many polymorphs of I2O are known?
98 structures of I2O are reported across 3 databases, spanning 21 distinct space groups.
What elements does I2O contain?
I2O contains I and O (2 elements).
Where does the data for I2O come from?
I2O data is cross-referenced from oqmd, jarvis, mpaloe.
Data sources & attribution
- oqmd — Data from the OQMD (oqmd.org). Cite: Saal et al., JOM 65, 1501 (2013); Kirklin et al., npj Comp. Mater. 1, 15010 (2015). (CC-BY-4.0)
- jarvis — Data from JARVIS (jarvis.nist.gov), NIST. Cite: Choudhary et al., npj Comp. Mater. 6, 173 (2020). (LicenseRef-US-Gov-PD)
- mpaloe — Data from MP-ALOE. Cite: Kuner et al., npj Comput. Mater. (2025), doi:10.1038/s41524-025-01834-9.
Analyze I2O in the Lattice Graph platform
Polymorph comparison, confidence scoring, supply-chain risk, and patent monitoring — across 85 source databases.
Explore the Platform →