Superconductors

Iron-Based Superconductors

Iron pnictides and chalcogenides (LaFeAsO, FeSe) discovered in 2008 — the second high-Tc family. Their multiband physics and high critical fields suit high-field magnet wire.

At a glance

Class Statistics

Compounds Tracked
6,414
Multi-Source DFT
0
With Synthesis Routes
65
Avg. Agreement
1.00 / 1.00
Overview

What are Iron-Based Superconductors?

Iron-based superconductors (IBS) represent a transformative class of materials that emerged in 2008, marking the second major family of high-temperature superconductors after the cuprates. Chemically, these materials are primarily composed of iron-pnictide or iron-chalcogenide layers, often interleaved with spacer layers such as rare-earth oxides or alkali metals. The fundamental structure typically features iron atoms arranged in a square lattice, coordinated by pnictogen or chalcogen atoms in a tetrahedral geometry. What makes IBS particularly compelling to the condensed matter community is their complex multiband electronic structure, where multiple charge carriers contribute to the superconducting state. This stands in contrast to the single-band behavior often associated with other systems. Furthermore, these materials exhibit high critical magnetic fields and relatively low anisotropy, which makes them highly attractive for practical engineering applications. Because they can maintain superconductivity under intense magnetic environments, they are considered prime candidates for the development of next-generation high-field magnet wires and power transmission infrastructure. Notable members of this family include the '1111' type, such as LaFeAsO, which first demonstrated the potential for high transition temperatures, and the '11' type, represented by FeSe, which is valued for its structural simplicity and unique electronic properties. As researchers continue to tune their chemical composition through doping or pressure, iron-based superconductors remain at the forefront of efforts to understand the mechanisms of unconventional superconductivity and to push the boundaries of superconducting technology in industrial settings.

Members

Top Iron-Based Superconductors

Ranked by data richness — literature synthesis coverage, multi-source DFT corroboration, and patent activity.

FormulaBand GapBest EAH (eV/atom)StabilityDFT SourcesRecipes
FeTe20.08–0.17 eV0.0000Stable11
AsFeLaO0.72–1.29 eV0.1730Above hull—4
FeTeMetallic / not reported0.0765Unstable12
FeSe20.02–0.39 eV0.0000Stable10
Fe2SeTeMetallic / not reported0.1858Above hull—5
Ce2Fe2Se2O31.24 eV0.0002Unstable12
Nd2Fe2Se2O31.35 eV0.0000Unstable12
LaFeAsOMetallic / not reported0.0000Stable14
FeAs20.24–0.79 eV0.0000Stable10
Ba3Fe2O9Te1.70 eV0.0000On hull (stable)—2
Fe2O9Sr3Te2.18 eV0.0016Near hull (likely stable)—2
FeSeMetallic / not reported0.0000Stable10
Fe2TeO61.23 eV0.0000Metastable11
La2Fe2Se2O31.24 eV0.0000Unstable11
Sm2Fe2Se2O31.32 eV0.0000Unstable11
FePSe30.22 eV0.1114Unstable10
FeSbSe0.46–0.71 eV0.0000Stable10
CrFeAs3.43 eV0.0056Metastable10
NbFeAs0.63 eV0.0000Stable10
FeAsO40.57–2.63 eV0.0000Metastable10
FeAsS0.66–0.84 eV0.0000Stable10
FeTeAs0.61–0.68 eV0.0000Stable10
La2FeSe2O20.32 eV0.1107Unstable11
FeSbTe0.34 eV0.0000Stable10
CaFeSeO1.15–2.14 eV0.0000On hull (stable)—1
FePSe0.11–0.83 eV0.0000Stable10
AsFeS0.74 eV0.0000On hull (stable)—0
FFeO3Se1.39 eV0.0000On hull (stable)—0
VFeAs0.40 eV0.0000Metastable10
ZrFeTe1.21–1.49 eV0.0529Metastable10
AsFeO41.56–2.08 eV0.0000On hull (stable)—0
Fe2Se1Te1Metallic / not reported—Not assessed—5
Fe4As2O111.19 eV0.0053Unstable10
FeAsMetallic / not reported0.0000Stable11
Fe8Se70.18 eV0.1725Unstable10
FeLa2O2Se21.14–1.65 eV0.1051Above hull—1
As10Fe4O22Pb1.80 eV0.0000On hull (stable)—0
As2CaFeO7Sb1.52 eV0.1444Above hull—0
AsFe2H19O18S2.72 eV0.0068Near hull (likely stable)—0
BrFeO5Te21.86 eV0.0639Metastable—0
C10Fe3O10Se2.17 eV0.7122Above hull—0
ClFeO5Te22.15 eV0.0669Metastable—0
FFeO3Te1.42 eV0.0000On hull (stable)—0
FeGe3K2Se80.17 eV0.0284Metastable—0
FeAs2O70.03 eV0.0700Metastable10
FeAsSe0.44–0.55 eV0.0000Stable10
TbFeAsO0.36 eV0.0000Stable10
TiFeSe1.02 eV0.1615Unstable10
TiFeTe1.11 eV0.0000Stable10
ZrFeSe0.39 eV0.3343Unstable10
Reference

Frequently Asked Questions

How many iron-based superconductors are in the database?

6,414 iron-based superconductors are tracked, of which 0 have multi-source DFT validation and 65 have documented synthesis routes.

More questions
What is the most data-rich iron-based superconductor?
FeTe2 is the most thoroughly characterized, with 71 reported structures.
Which iron-based superconductor has the widest band gap?
Among the top compounds, CrFeAs has the widest reported DFT band gap (3.43 eV).
How do iron-based superconductors differ from cuprates?
While both are unconventional superconductors, iron-based materials feature a multi-orbital electronic structure and iron-based layers, whereas cuprates are based on copper-oxide planes and typically exhibit stronger electronic correlations.
Why are these materials useful for high-field magnets?
They possess high upper critical fields and relatively low anisotropy, meaning they can remain superconducting even when subjected to very strong magnetic fields, which is essential for magnet wire performance.
What role does doping play in these materials?
Doping is used to introduce charge carriers into the iron-based layers, which suppresses magnetic order and promotes the emergence of the superconducting state.
Are iron-based superconductors difficult to manufacture?
Manufacturing involves complex synthesis techniques like thin-film deposition or powder-in-tube processing, and managing the chemical sensitivity of the materials remains a key challenge for large-scale production.
Reading

Related Research

Explore

Related Material Classes

Screen iron-based superconductors computationally

Evaluate stability, supply-chain risk, and patent whitespace before committing lab resources.

Explore the Platform →
Results are informational and should be validated by qualified professionals. See Terms of Service