FeBiO3
FeBiO3 has a DFT band gap of 1.13–1.52 eV across 43 reported structures in 8 space groups; its reference structure is trigonal (R3c (No. 161)). Cross-validated across 3 computational databases.
Key Properties
Cross-validated computational properties for FeBiO3, aggregated across 3 databases.
Band GapEnergy needed to move an electron from the valence band to the conduction band. Lower or zero values tend to behave more metallic; larger gaps are more insulating or semiconducting.
Energy Above HullThermodynamic distance from the most stable set of competing phases. 0 eV/atom is on the convex hull; small positive values may still be experimentally accessible.
StabilityA plain-language summary of the best reported energy-above-hull result. It reflects whether the lowest-energy structure is on, near, or far from the stability hull.
StructuresCount of reported calculated crystal structures for this formula, including alternate polymorphs, source databases, and observed space groups.
Cross-Source DFT Agreement
How well independent DFT databases agree on the thermodynamics of FeBiO3. Tight agreement means computed properties can be trusted without re-running calculations.
Agreement ScoreA normalized confidence score summarizing how closely independent DFT databases agree. Higher scores mean tighter cross-source agreement.
Hull SpreadDifference between the highest and lowest energy-above-hull values reported by comparable sources. Smaller spread means less thermodynamic disagreement.
Sources ComparedNumber and names of computational sources with comparable entries for this formula.
Space Group ConsensusWhether independent sources predict the same crystal symmetry for the lowest-energy structure.
Reported Structures
Lowest-energy structures reported for FeBiO3, ranked by energy above hull.
| Space GroupSymmetry classification of the crystal arrangement. The number is the international space-group index. | Crystal SystemBroad lattice family, such as cubic, tetragonal, monoclinic, or triclinic, derived from unit-cell symmetry. | Band Gap (eV)Electronic gap calculated for this specific reported structure, measured in electronvolts. | E above hull (eV/atom)Thermodynamic distance from the convex hull for this structure, normalized per atom. Lower is generally more stable. | E/atom (eV)Computed total energy normalized per atom. Use energy above hull, not this value alone, when comparing stability. | Density (g/cm³)Mass per relaxed crystal volume, reported in grams per cubic centimeter. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R3c (No. 161) | trigonal | 1.30 | 0.0016 | -7.114 | 8.29 |
| — | — | 1.42 | 0.0092 | -1.560 | — |
| Pnma (No. 62) | orthorhombic | 1.54 | 0.0116 | -7.104 | 8.64 |
| — | — | 1.28 | 0.0154 | -1.554 | — |
| — | — | 1.13 | 0.0203 | -1.549 | — |
| P4mm (No. 99) | tetragonal | 1.43 | 0.0268 | -7.088 | 7.56 |
| — | — | 1.15 | 0.0282 | -1.541 | — |
| R3m (No. 160) | trigonal | 1.81 | 0.0336 | -7.082 | 7.77 |
| — | — | 1.27 | 0.0349 | -1.534 | — |
| — | — | 1.41 | 0.0452 | -1.524 | — |
| R3 (No. 146) | trigonal | 0.00 | 0.0457 | -1.361 | — |
| Pnma (No. 62) | orthorhombic | 0.00 | 0.0512 | -1.356 | — |
Synthesis Routes
Literature-extracted synthesis procedures targeting FeBiO3.
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about FeBiO3, answered from cross-validated data.
What is the band gap of FeBiO3?
FeBiO3 has a DFT-computed band gap of 1.13–1.52 eV across 43 reported structures. Standard DFT underestimates band gaps, so the measured gap is typically larger.
Is FeBiO3 a metal, semiconductor, or insulator?
Is FeBiO3 thermodynamically stable?
What is the crystal structure of FeBiO3?
What is the density of FeBiO3?
How many polymorphs of FeBiO3 are known?
How is FeBiO3 synthesized?
What elements does FeBiO3 contain?
Where does the data for FeBiO3 come from?
Related Research
A catalog of interpretation errors and compute failure modes from our materials discovery pipeline: thermostat overshoot (625K target / 750K actual), MACE artifacts on perovskites, PBE bandgaps presented without HSE correction, metallic DFPT results, phonon instabilities, 53 files with THz vs cm⁻¹ confusion, and more.
Every single Modal QE DFPT and HSE06 result from our April 2026 GPU compute campaign was an error payload, not usable data. 13 files landed on the volume with status ERROR, PSEUDO_ERROR, SCF_FAILED, DFPT_FAILED, PARSE_ERROR, or NOT_CONVERGED. The honest-null pattern in our ledger is what saved rankings from corruption.
Related Compounds
Other Oxide Oxygen-Evolution Catalysts in the database.
Data sources & attribution
- materials_project — Data from the Materials Project (materialsproject.org). Cite: Jain et al., APL Materials 1, 011002 (2013). (CC-BY-4.0)
- oqmd — Data from the OQMD (oqmd.org). Cite: Saal et al., JOM 65, 1501 (2013); Kirklin et al., npj Comp. Mater. 1, 15010 (2015). (CC-BY-4.0)
- jarvis — Data from JARVIS (jarvis.nist.gov), NIST. Cite: Choudhary et al., npj Comp. Mater. 6, 173 (2020). (LicenseRef-US-Gov-PD)
Analyze FeBiO3 in the Lattice Graph platform
Polymorph comparison, confidence scoring, supply-chain risk, and patent monitoring — across 85 source databases.
Explore the Platform →