TaOF
TaOF has a DFT band gap of 0.09 eV across 19 reported structures in 9 space groups; its reference structure is orthorhombic (Pmmn (No. 59)). Cross-validated across 2 computational databases.
Key Properties
Cross-validated computational properties for TaOF, aggregated across 2 databases.
Band GapEnergy needed to move an electron from the valence band to the conduction band. Lower or zero values tend to behave more metallic; larger gaps are more insulating or semiconducting.
Energy Above HullThermodynamic distance from the most stable set of competing phases. 0 eV/atom is on the convex hull; small positive values may still be experimentally accessible.
StabilityA plain-language summary of the best reported energy-above-hull result. It reflects whether the lowest-energy structure is on, near, or far from the stability hull.
StructuresCount of reported calculated crystal structures for this formula, including alternate polymorphs, source databases, and observed space groups.
Cross-Source DFT Agreement
How well independent DFT databases agree on the thermodynamics of TaOF. Tight agreement means computed properties can be trusted without re-running calculations.
Only 1 independent DFT source (jarvis) reports a hull energy for TaOF, so cross-source agreement can't be assessed yet.
Reported Structures
Lowest-energy structures reported for TaOF, ranked by energy above hull.
| Space GroupSymmetry classification of the crystal arrangement. The number is the international space-group index. | Crystal SystemBroad lattice family, such as cubic, tetragonal, monoclinic, or triclinic, derived from unit-cell symmetry. | Band Gap (eV)Electronic gap calculated for this specific reported structure, measured in electronvolts. | E above hull (eV/atom)Thermodynamic distance from the convex hull for this structure, normalized per atom. Lower is generally more stable. | E/atom (eV)Computed total energy normalized per atom. Use energy above hull, not this value alone, when comparing stability. | Density (g/cm³)Mass per relaxed crystal volume, reported in grams per cubic centimeter. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pmmn (No. 59) | orthorhombic | 0.00 | 0.2457 | -2.512 | — |
| P-6m2 (No. 187) | hexagonal | 0.00 | 0.6109 | -2.147 | — |
| P4mm (No. 99) | tetragonal | 0.00 | 1.4911 | -1.266 | — |
| Pm (No. 6) | monoclinic | 0.09 | 5.2707 | 2.513 | — |
| P-1 (No. 2) | triclinic | — | — | — | 8.86 |
| P21/m (No. 11) | monoclinic | — | — | — | 8.13 |
| P-1 (No. 2) | triclinic | — | — | — | 9.81 |
| P-1 (No. 2) | triclinic | — | — | — | 6.78 |
| P-1 (No. 2) | triclinic | — | — | — | 9.89 |
| Pmmn (No. 59) | orthorhombic | — | — | — | 8.18 |
| P1 (No. 1) | triclinic | — | — | — | 8.26 |
| P-1 (No. 2) | triclinic | — | — | — | 9.84 |
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about TaOF, answered from cross-validated data.
What is the band gap of TaOF?
TaOF has a DFT-computed band gap of 0.09 eV across 19 reported structures. Standard DFT underestimates band gaps, so the measured gap is typically larger.
Is TaOF a metal, semiconductor, or insulator?
Is TaOF thermodynamically stable?
What is the crystal structure of TaOF?
How many polymorphs of TaOF are known?
What elements does TaOF contain?
Where does the data for TaOF come from?
Data sources & attribution
- jarvis — Data from JARVIS (jarvis.nist.gov), NIST. Cite: Choudhary et al., npj Comp. Mater. 6, 173 (2020). (LicenseRef-US-Gov-PD)
- mpaloe — Data from MP-ALOE. Cite: Kuner et al., npj Comput. Mater. (2025), doi:10.1038/s41524-025-01834-9.
Analyze TaOF in the Lattice Graph platform
Polymorph comparison, confidence scoring, supply-chain risk, and patent monitoring — across 85 source databases.
Explore the Platform →