Li3PS4

Li3PS4 has a DFT band gap of 2.10–3.18 eV across 19 reported structures in 3 space groups; its reference structure is orthorhombic (Pnma (No. 62)). Cross-validated across 4 computational databases.

At a glance

Key Properties

Cross-validated computational properties for Li3PS4, aggregated across 4 databases.

Band Gap

2.10–3.18 eV
Range across DFT structures · ground state: wide gap

Energy Above Hull

0.000 eV/atom
Best (lowest) across sources

Stability

Stable
2 DFT sources

Structures

19
4 databases, 3 space groups
Validation

Cross-Source DFT Agreement

How well independent DFT databases agree on the thermodynamics of Li3PS4. Tight agreement means computed properties can be trusted without re-running calculations.

Agreement Score

1.00 / 1.00
Trust tier: medium

Hull Spread

0.000 eV
EAH spread across sources

Sources Compared

2
materials_project, oqmd

Space Group Consensus

—
Crystallography

Reported Structures

Lowest-energy structures reported for Li3PS4, ranked by energy above hull.

Space GroupCrystal SystemBand Gap (eV)E above hull (eV/atom)E/atom (eV)Density (g/cm³)
——3.180.0000-1.131—
Pnma (No. 62)orthorhombic2.810.0000-4.6431.85
I-42m (No. 121)tetragonal2.960.0074-4.6361.87
Pnma (No. 62)orthorhombic2.820.0138-4.6291.86
——3.000.0162-1.115—
——2.810.0192-1.112—
——2.100.0680-1.063—
Pnma (No. 62)orthorhombic———1.87
Pnma (No. 62)orthorhombic———1.85
Pnma (No. 62)orthorhombic———1.81
Pnma (No. 62)orthorhombic———1.84
Pnma (No. 62)orthorhombic———1.86
Synthesis

Synthesis Routes

Literature-extracted synthesis procedures targeting Li3PS4.

Solid State
Procedure available · ceder_solid_state
Solid State
Procedure available · ceder_solid_state
Solid State
Procedure available · ceder_solid_state
Solid State
Procedure available · ceder_solid_state
Solid State
Procedure available · ceder_solid_state
Solid State
Procedure available · ceder_solid_state
Intellectual Property

Patent Landscape

1 patent reference Li3PS4 or close compositional variants.

PatentTitleAssigneeGranted
11271245Production method for solid electrolyte having Li3PS4——
Reference

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about Li3PS4, answered from cross-validated data.

What is the band gap of Li3PS4?

Li3PS4 has a DFT-computed band gap of 2.10–3.18 eV across 19 reported structures. Standard DFT underestimates band gaps, so the measured gap is typically larger.

More questions
Is Li3PS4 a metal, semiconductor, or insulator?
DFT predicts a wide band gap of up to 3.18 eV (an insulator or wide-band-gap material).
Is Li3PS4 thermodynamically stable?
Yes — Li3PS4 sits on the convex hull (energy above hull 0 eV/atom), i.e. stable.
What is the crystal structure of Li3PS4?
The reference structure of Li3PS4 is orthorhombic symmetry, space group Pnma (No. 62).
What is the density of Li3PS4?
The computed density of the ground-state structure of Li3PS4 is 1.85 g/cm³.
How many polymorphs of Li3PS4 are known?
19 structures of Li3PS4 are reported across 4 databases, spanning 3 distinct space groups.
How is Li3PS4 synthesized?
Literature-reported routes for Li3PS4 include solid state (10 procedures documented).
What elements does Li3PS4 contain?
Li3PS4 contains Li, P, and S (3 elements).
Where does the data for Li3PS4 come from?
Li3PS4 data is cross-referenced from oqmd, materials_project, cod, mpaloe.
Explore

Related Compounds

Other Sulfide Solid Electrolytes in the database.

Data sources & attribution
  • oqmd — Data from the OQMD (oqmd.org). Cite: Saal et al., JOM 65, 1501 (2013); Kirklin et al., npj Comp. Mater. 1, 15010 (2015). (CC-BY-4.0)
  • materials_project — Data from the Materials Project (materialsproject.org). Cite: Jain et al., APL Materials 1, 011002 (2013). (CC-BY-4.0)
  • cod — Data from the Crystallography Open Database (crystallography.net/cod/). Cite: Grazulis et al., J. Appl. Cryst. 42, 726 (2009). (CC0-1.0)
  • mpaloe — Data from MP-ALOE. Cite: Kuner et al., npj Comput. Mater. (2025), doi:10.1038/s41524-025-01834-9.

Analyze Li3PS4 in the Lattice Graph platform

Polymorph comparison, confidence scoring, supply-chain risk, and patent monitoring — across 85 source databases.

Explore the Platform →
Results are informational and should be validated by qualified professionals. See Terms of Service